1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12
13 14 15
16 17 18
19 20 21
22 23 24
25 26 27
28
Appendix 1 - Methodology
The Countryside Commission approach to landscape assessment, set out
in their document CCP 302 provided a framework for the study. A variation
upon this methodology, particularly with regard to field description and
recording, has been developed by Landscape Design Associates and tested
for work of this nature over a number of years.
Overall, the landscape assessment combines fieldwork with information
gathered from consultations and desk studies. A structured, consistent
method was used to record and collate the information, to analyse landscape
character and provide a critical assessment of the essential features
of the landscape of the Sussex Downs AONB. The assessment was carried
out in the following way:
Initial familiarisation
An initial tour of the AONB provided an overall appreciation of the
scale and variation in landscape character and the nature of the transitions
between different landscape types. An overall impression of landscape
character, based on local advice, general field appraisals and map study
led to preliminary ideas on potential character areas which were mapped
in sketch form. The field recording system was then refined, tested and
found to be appropriate.
Initial Consultations and desk study
Consultations were carried out in two phases; preceding and during the
field survey, and following the production of the draft document. Time
constraints dictated that the field survey stage of the work should start
without delay. However the area managers of the Sussex Downs Conservation
Board were consulted towards the end of the field survey period and a
data collection exercise, which involved gathering and analysing relevant
information from a wide range of historic, geological, geomorphological
and archaeological sources, ran concurrently with the field survey.
Field survey
The field survey involved a structured visual analysis of the AONB.
Variations in landscape character were assessed and the information recorded
by a variety of methods designed to test the hypothesis generated in the
desk study and to map landscape character accurately, consistently and
systematically. Annotated 1:25,000 OS maps were used to record the boundaries
between areas with different landscape types in the field. Viewsheds,
landmarks, strong visual edges and the character of transitions between
different landscape types were all noted. The mosaic of landscape types
gradually emerged.
Field record sheets were designed to record factual information about
the distribution, form and alignment of landscape components and to analyse
how they are organised to form specific patterns and compositions. The
systematic recording format provided an opportunity to combine factual,
visual evidence with creative description and a more subjective response.
Particular attention was paid to identifying the special qualities of
each landscape and the specific visual and spatial relationships which
determine landscape character. The field record sheets also recorded evidence
of vulnerability to landscape change and a brief assessment of the appropriate
landscape management strategy.
A range of vantage points was selected throughout the AONB to illustrate
the variation of landscape characteristics within one landscape type.
In addition to the landscape descriptions recorded on the field record
sheets from these vantage points, photographs recorded typical and atypical
examples of landscape character and any particular landmarks which contribute
to the specific identity of an area.
Analysis
The field survey identified the key characteristic features of each
landscape type and built up a detailed understanding of the AONB landscape.
This visual evidence was combined with information derived from consultations,
desk studies and field evidence to provide a set of key landscape management
guidelines for each landscape type which, if implemented, will ensure
a secure future for the landscape of the AONB.
Further consultations and desk studies
A consultation draft of the landscape assessment report was sent to
a representatives of a wide range of organisations, including MAFF, English
Nature, the Country Landowner's Association, the National Trust, the Council
for the Protection of Rural England, the Forestry Authority, Sussex University
and all the local authorities with an interest in the AONB.
The report was amended to reflect the comments and suggestions received
from those consulted.
The landscape assessment is available from the Sussex Downs Conservation
Board as a technical report, one of several such studies providing essential
background information about the landscape of the AONB.
The objectives of the Board are:
• to protect, conserve and enhance the natural beauty and amenity of
the Sussex Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB), including
its physical, ecological and cultural landscape;
• to promote the quiet informal enjoyment of the Sussex Downs AONB by
the general public but only so far as is consistent with the first objective;
• generally to promote sustainable forms of economic and social development,
especially working with farmers and landowners to encourage land management
which supports the two objectives above.
Previous