SUSSEX DOWNS CONSERVATION BOARD Agenda Item No.13
7th JULY 2000
SOUTH DOWNS WAY MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
REPORT BY THE SUSSEX DOWNS OFFICER
1. Introduction
RECOMMENDATION
That the South Downs Way Management Strategy be endorsed.
Martin Beaton
Sussex Downs Office
CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 National Trails in Context
1.2 Roles of the Partners in National Trail Management
1.3 The South Downs Way
2 MANAGEMENT APPROACH
2.1 Aims of Management
2.2 Management of the Trail
2.3 Management Structure
2.4 Funding Arrangements
3 PRODUCTION OF THE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
3.1 Policy Framework
3.2 Format of the Management Strategy
3.3 User and Condition Survey
3.4 Monitoring and Review
4 ROUTE MANAGEMENT
4.1 Overall Management Co-ordination
4.2 Legal Management
4.3 Surface Management
4.4 Signposting/Waymarking
4.5 Furniture
5 ACCESS
5.1 Public Transport Provision
5.2 Car Parking Provision
5.3 Access for less able users
5.4 Linking Routes
6 CORRIDOR STRATEGIES
6.1 Landscape and Nature Conservation
6.2 Planning and Transport Policy
7 VISITOR MANAGEMENT
7.1 Conflicts of Interest
7.2 Development of Circular Walks
8 SERVICES AND FACILITIES
8.1 Provision of water points/hitching posts and bicycle parking
8.2 Provision of Accommodation
8.3 Provision of Information
9 MARKETING
9.1 Marketing Strategy
APPENDICES (NOT ATTACHED)
I Summary of Action Points
II Documents Consulted
III Costed Annual Work Programme (partly subject to JAC/SDCB Business Plan decisions)
SOUTH DOWNS WAY NATIONAL TRAIL
DRAFT MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 National Trails in Context
The South Downs Way is one of thirteen National Trails in England and Wales, and is a bridleway route, thereby making it available to equestrians and cyclists in addition to pedestrians. National Trails began life as Long Distance Paths, designated under the provisions of the 1949 National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act, the first one being the Pennine Way in 1965. In 1989, the Countryside Commission produced a policy document called ‘Paths, Routes and Trails’ which renamed them as National Trails, and set out the criteria by which they were to be selected.
The purpose of designating a National Trail is ‘to allow the public to make extensive journeys on foot, horseback or bicycle on routes which, for the most part, do not pass along roads used by vehicles’ and to offer people the chance to experience the character and distinctive landscape through which the route passes. The National Trails therefore provide a variety of routes through the grandest, wildest and most beautiful landscapes in the country, each one having its own particular intrinsic quality.
Because of their nationally important role, the aim of the Countryside Agency (the successor body to the Countryside Commission) is to ensure that the Trails are managed to the highest standards in all aspects. Each route has a National Trail Officer whose responsibility it is to work towards that goal, in partnership with the Agency, local authorities, national park authorities, landowners, voluntary bodies and other parties with an interest in managing or using the route and its surroundings. National Trails have their own status and changes to them are governed by the legal provisions of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949. All the National Trails are identified by the Acorn logo and this should represent a hallmark of quality.
1.2 Roles of the Partners in National Trail Management
1.3 The South Downs Way
In 1972, the Countryside Commission designated the South Downs Way as the first national long distance bridleway route in the country. At that time, the Way was 80 miles in length and extended from Eastbourne in East Sussex in the east, to the Hampshire/West Sussex border near Buriton in the west. In 1991 the route was officially extended west to Winchester in the west forming a route of 161 kilometres (approximately 100 miles). Some sections within Hampshire have yet to be finalised, but a route from start to finish is available on the ground for horses, cyclists and walkers. The route follows the top of the northern scarp slope of the South Downs for the most part, descending to cross the river valleys, and the major arterial roads running north to south through the area. Within East and West Sussex, the entire route lies within the Sussex Downs AONB, and in Hampshire, it is encompassed within the East Hampshire AONB, indicating the high scenic quality of the route. For a significant part of its route it also passes through or near to a number of sites designated for their national and international importance in nature conservation terms, including Sites of Special Scientific Interest, National Nature Reserves, and locally designated sites such as Local Nature Reserves and Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) (or SNCIs in East and West Sussex). There are also a considerable number of important archaeological locations along the route, many designated as Scheduled Ancient Monuments, but also a significant number of interesting features that are registered but unscheduled and therefore unprotected.
In one or two places along the route, two separate routes co-exist, one for equestrians and cyclists, and one for walkers. At the eastern end of the Trail, the footpath link follows the Seven Sisters cliff top path from Beachy Head to Alfriston, whilst the main bridleway route takes an inland route, past the Long Man of Wilmington, a giant figure cut into the chalk. Between Old Winchester Hill and Beacon Hill, across the Meon Valley in Hampshire, the Way divides into two due to difficulties in obtaining final agreement on the route.
In view of the recently announced intention of Government to create a National Park in the South Downs, the future management and funding of the Trail may be reconsidered at some point. However, the overall aims and objectives for the management of the National Trail will not be significantly affected.
2 MANAGEMENT APPROACH
2.1 Aims of Management
The aims for the management of the South Downs Way are in line with those of other National Trails, and are as follows:
2.2 Management of the Trail
In 1986, the Sussex Downs AONB Forum agreed to prepare a management plan for the South Downs Way, as part of the initiative on the part of the local councils to co-ordinate the management of the AONB. The resulting document, ‘The South Downs Way, A Management Plan’ was produced in 1988, and included an annual works programme for 1988/9. The annual programme was monitored and revised each year until 1992, but the management plan itself is now in need of significant revision in the light of policy changes, both local and national, during the intervening years.
Following the establishment in 1992 of the Sussex Downs Conservation Board (SDCB), the maintenance of the South Downs Way within East and West Sussex has been managed by them as part of their remit to manage all public rights of way in the AONB. In Hampshire, the responsibility for the management of the Way remains with the highway authority, Hampshire County Council, although some of the adjoining public rights of way are currently managed for maintenance purposes by East Hampshire District Council, under an agency agreement. For legal matters relating to enforcement and alignment, the responsibility rests with the respective County Councils in all cases. In 1995 a South Downs Way Officer was appointed and employed by the SDCB to oversee the management of the route within the Sussex Downs AONB, and during this period, several improvements to the route were made. A South Downs Way Liaison Group was set up and met regularly, and a Visitor Survey was also carried out. This appointment came to an end in March 1998 and was renewed in 1999, when a new National Trail Officer was appointed to cover the whole of the route from Winchester to Eastbourne. This position is currently based with Hampshire County Council and the production of a strategic plan for the management and development of the South Downs Way is seen as the primary function in order to identify future priorities for action.
2.3 Management Structure
The current management structure for the South Downs Way consists of a Steering Group, which consists of representatives from the Countryside Agency, Hampshire County Council, Sussex Downs Conservation Board, West Sussex County Council and East Sussex County Council which together with the National Trail Officer, determines the work programme both in the short term, and more strategically. The absence of a National Trail Officer has meant the temporary demise of the Liaison Group, which formerly existed as a means of informing both the wider partnership and the project itself, to assist in the management of the Trail. The Countryside Agency is considering proposing a management structure that is more consistent and similar for all the Trails. It is proposed that a Management Committee, consisting of the National Trail Officer, the Countryside Agency and the relevant Trail Management Authorities, will guide and direct the management of the Trail, whilst sub-groups will be formed to advise on specific areas of management, where particular expertise or interests are of relevance. Close links will be maintained with the East Hampshire AONB JAC. A Forum or Liaison Group for the exchange of information between all interested parties will meet at least once a year, and more often if considered necessary. The line management of the National Trail Officer will be the responsibility of the employing authority, which will also be responsible for the training and development of the Officer and the provision of an office and administrative support.
2.4 Funding Arrangements
The current funding arrangements for the management of the South Downs Way differ from one authority to another. The main operational funding has been through separate bidding by the Sussex Downs Conservation Board, and Hampshire County Council, with opportunities to improve co-ordination of work along the route as a whole. There has also been inconsistency in the proportion of funding awarded to the various partners. Some areas of work have received little or no grant aid, such as enforcement work or legal work, and some bridge maintenance work, whilst other areas of work are eligible for up to 100% in support funding. The funding for National Trails is under review by the Countryside Agency, which is seeking to expand the potential sources of money, whilst maintaining its commitment to support local authorities and other managing partners to develop, maintain and manage the routes. Future management of the South Downs Way will work towards a more co-ordinated and structured approach to securing funding for all aspects of management work, operating through the Management Committee.
3 PRODUCTION OF THE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
3.1 Policy Framework
The policy guidelines that are reflected in this management strategy are derived from national and local policies set out in relevant documents by the Countryside Commission (now the Countryside Agency), and the local authorities through which the National Trail passes. It includes the strategies produced by both the SDCB in respect of the Sussex Downs AONB, and the East Hampshire AONB Joint Advisory Committee. National policy on National Trails is reflected in ‘Meeting the Grade’, a Countryside Commission publication setting out the expected standards to be attained in all areas relating to the management of such routes. A bibliography is contained in the appendices. In line with national policy, in the process of drawing up the management strategy extensive consultation with interested parties has been undertaken, and a list of consultees is also included in the appendices.
3.2 Format of the Management Strategy
The strategy addresses a number of topics that together cover all the aims of the management of the Trail. Within each of these are several issues that need to be addressed. Each of these issues is explained in terms of the national or local policy guidelines, and the background to the current situation. An objective is then set out, accompanied by action points which will achieve the objective, together with details of the expected timescale and the anticipated partners in each case. (The National Trail Officer will generally be involved in co-ordinating the action in all the Action Points and unless the role falls largely to them, they are not mentioned in the ‘Partners’ column.) The plan will cover a five-year period, and will be subject to review in 2005. A costed Annual Work Programme will form an integral part of the Strategy, and will be monitored and revised each year.
3.3 User Survey and Conditions Survey
A User Survey was undertaken during 1996 and 1997, and the results have been taken into consideration in the production of this management strategy. The final analysis of the survey has now been published and a summary document is also available. Both documents are available from the South Downs Way Officer. The condition of the Trail is monitored on a regular basis by the SDCB as part of their role in managing the rights of way in the Sussex Downs AONB. In Hampshire, a conditions survey of the rights of way network is being undertaken by the Ramblers Association in conjunction with Hampshire County Council. It has not been possible to extract the relevant information for the South Downs Way before the preparation of this Strategy, and the need to undertake this task is highlighted in the section on surface management.
3.4 Monitoring and Review
As a result of drawing up an annual Work Programme, the Strategy itself will be subject to an annual review, and consequently an assessment of the achievement of the objectives. The Liaison Group will provide an opportunity for all the partners to comment on the progress towards the objectives and the effectiveness of the Strategy in achieving its aims, and thus influence the revision of the Strategy itself, in due course. The timing of the first review is likely to be affected by the creation of the new National Park. The annual Work Programme will be determined by the Management Committee in line with the available budget, but the revision of the Strategy will be subject to consultation with all partners.
4 ROUTE MANAGEMENT
4.1 Overall Management Co-ordination
i. Policy Guidelines
‘Meeting the Grade’ states that the delivery of high quality National Trails relies upon a partnership between many organisations and individuals: the Countryside Agency, local authorities, voluntary bodies, landowners and occupiers, private sector companies, local individuals and communities. The Countryside Agency’s document ‘A Commitment to National Trails in England’ proposes that a more consistent management approach for all National Trails should be adopted and this strategy attempts to follow their vision.
ii. Background
The management of the Trail to date has been shared between the three County Councils (West Sussex, East Sussex and Hampshire) and the Sussex Downs Conservation Board, together with a number of other local authorities (e.g. Eastbourne). In certain circumstances this has resulted in a lack of co-ordination, and delays in resolving issues. It may also have limited the ability to protect or promote the Trail due to a lack of consensus amongst the bodies involved.
iii. Objective
To ensure that all relevant partners are fully represented, involved in and committed to the management of the South Downs Way
iv. Action Points
|
NO. |
ACTION |
YEAR(S) |
PARTNERS |
|
1 |
Include all relevant Surveying Authorities, Highway Authorities or their agents on the Management Committee and meet at least twice a year. |
0N-GOING |
SDCB, ESCC, WSCC, HCC, CA |
|
2 |
Ensure adequate funding for all aspects of management, and co-ordinate bidding. |
2 - 3 |
JAC/SDCB, ESCC, WSCC, HCC, CA |
|
3 |
Arrange regular meetings of area staff from all partner authorities. |
ON-GOING |
JAC/SDCB, ESCC, WSCC, HCC |
|
4 |
Facilitate greater liaison between users, landowners and occupiers, and the partner authorities by setting up a Forum to discuss all aspects of the Trail management. |
ON-GOING |
ALL |
|
5 |
Carry out a User survey, and produce a full report and a summary. |
3 - 4 |
NTO |
|
6 |
Carry out an annual inspection of the South Downs Way to ensure that management objectives are being met. |
ON-GOING |
NTO |
4.2 Legal Management
i. Policy Guidelines
‘Meeting the Grade ‘ states that the route of the National Trail should be a route on legally defined public rights of way, readily passable and unobstructed, and no sections on busy or dangerous roads. Safe crossing points of roads and railways should be provided with grade-separated crossings where traffic conditions require them. The route should be free of motorised vehicles for the most part. In general, the use of Traffic Regulation Orders (TROs) is considered to be a last resort, with the preference being for voluntary restraint where applicable.
ii. Background
The legal management of the South Downs Way is divided between the three County Councils who deal with enforcement matters (including any TROs), alignment matters (and any resulting public path orders, modification orders and variation orders) and conveyancing or compensation matters. There are a number of locations along the route of the Trail where the route used on the ground does not coincide with the Definitive Map; where the Ordnance Survey maps show a route which is not a public right of way; where the reclassification of Roads Used as Public Paths (RUPPs) has not yet been carried out, resulting in some confusion about the extent of public rights; and where the designated path does not provide users with the safest route.
iii Objective
To work with partner authorities to ensure that the legal route of the South Downs Way is safely and accurately aligned on public rights of way; that the status of the constituent public rights of way are legally clarified; and that the route is legally recorded on the relevant Definitive Maps.
iv Action Points
|
NO. |
ACTION |
YEAR(S) |
PARTNERS |
|
7 |
Identify anomalies on the route of the path of any nature and determine the most appropriate means of rectifying. |
1 - 2 |
ALL |
|
8 |
Implement changes to ensure accurate legal route is recorded. |
3 - 5 |
HCC, ESCC, WSCC, CA |
|
9 |
Implement the finalisation of the route in Hampshire. |
1 - 3 |
HCC, CA |
|
10 |
Identify improvements to the route to increase public safety and enjoyment. |
0N-GOING |
ALL |
|
11 |
Encourage any necessary reclassification of public rights of way to clarify status. |
1 - 3 |
CA, ESCC, WSCC, HCC, JAC/SDCB |
|
12 |
Consider the need for vehicle management measures where necessary for public safety. |
ON-GOING |
HCC, JAC/SDCB ESCC, WSCC |
4.3 Surface Management
i Policy Guidelines
‘Meeting the Grade’ states that the route of a National Trail should be as natural as possible and preferably a green sward. Where this is not possible, it should be reinforced in the least artificial manner possible. Steps should be kept to a minimum and bridleways should not be on ground soft enough to allow a horse or cycle to sink deeply into it. It should be free from excessive vegetation, including road verges and refuges where necessary, and litter-free.
ii Background
The responsibility for the surface maintenance of public rights of way rests with the Highway Authority, who may delegate that role to another agency. In the Sussex Downs AONB, the maintenance of all public rights of way is carried out by the SDCB, and this includes the maintenance of the South Downs Way. In Hampshire, the South Downs Way is maintained by Hampshire County Council, whilst some linking paths are maintained by East Hampshire District Council under an agency agreement. There is a resultant variation in the standard of maintenance carried out, due to differing staff and financial resources and a lack of strategic co-ordination. The responsibility to keep highways free of litter rests with the local district, borough or unitary authority.
iii Objective
To work with partner authorities to ensure a consistently high standard of surface maintenance along the length of the South Downs Way, appropriate to the geology and topography of the area, in keeping with its status as a National Trail, as outlined in ‘Meeting the Grade’.
iv Action Points
|
NO. |
ACTION |
YEARS |
PARTNERS |
|
13 |
Carry out a full condition survey of the South Downs Way, and produce a full report. |
2 — 3 |
SDCB HCC |
|
14 |
Develop design guidelines for different surface types and encourage their adoption by the relevant authorities. |
1 - 3 |
SDCB, HCC |
|
15 |
Develop co-ordinated work programmes covering the length of the South Downs Way in conjunction with the National Trail Officer. |
1 - 4 |
SDCB HCC, ESCC, WSCC |
|
16 |
Establish a consistent approach in annual vegetation management along the length of the National Trail. |
1 - 3 |
SDCB, HCC |
4.4 Signposting /Waymarking
i Policy Guidelines
‘Meeting the Grade’ states that the user should expect to find correctly colour coded waymarking with the Acorn logo on every sign. The directional posts should be clear and informative, and there should be a consistent design in sympathetic materials. On local routes, additional information on services should be given, especially where day visitors are likely.
ii Background
Waymarking and signposting along parts of the route is currently inconsistent where it is being carried out by the different authorities, and is also confused in some places by waymarks for other promoted routes which co-exist with the South Downs Way. To give confidence to users, the status of the Trail should be clear, both in terms of public rights, and identification of the Way.
iii Objective
To ensure a consistent approach to the signposting and waymarking of the South Downs Way, in keeping with its status as a National Trail and as outlined in ‘Meeting the Grade’, but respecting local distinctiveness.
iv Action Points
|
NO. |
ACTION |
YEAR(S) |
PARTNERS |
|
17 |
Further develop design standards for signposts and waymarks to be used along the length of the South Downs Way. |
1 — 2 |
SDCB, HCC |
|
18 |
Ensure that the signing of the National Trail takes priority over other promoted routes, where they co-exist. |
1 — 2 |
SDCB, Local Authorities |
|
19 |
Develop a consistent policy towards the use of signposts and waymarks in relation to type and location. |
1 — 2 |
Local Authorities/SDCB Landowners |
|
20 |
Develop standard information signs and notices to be fitted where necessary and appropriate. |
1 - 2 |
Local Authorities/SDCB Landowners, Users |
4.5 Furniture
i Policy Guidelines
‘Meeting the Grade’ states that the design and style of gates, bridges and stiles should be high quality and of appropriate materials to suit the landscape. Gates on bridleways should be openable from horseback with one hand and bridge parapets should be sufficiently high, especially over roads.
ii Background
In general, although the legal liability rests with the landowners, the maintenance of gates and stiles along the route of the Trail is carried out by the Authorities concerned, but the quality and type of furniture used varies from place to place. In some places, barriers are required for stock control, and where the Way follows a farm track, field gates rather than bridle gates may be in use. The bridges are maintained by the Highway Authority, or their delegated agent.
iii Objective
To ensure that all furniture is of a consistently high standard, well maintained and convenient to use, in keeping with the nature of the Trail and conforming to the guidelines set out in ‘Meeting the Grade’, but respecting local distinctiveness.
iv Action Points
|
NO. |
ACTION |
YEAR(S) |
PARTNERS |
|
21 |
Further develop design guidance for gates (and stiles where appropriate) for use along the whole length of the Trail. |
1 - 2 |
SDCB, HCC, Landowners, Users |
|
22 |
Ensure consistency of grant aid where landowners undertake the work. |
ON-GOING |
NTO, CA |
|
23 |
Ensure regular bridge inspections are made to an agreed programme. |
ON-GOING |
ESCC,WSCC,HCC |
5 ACCESS
5.1 Public Transport Provision
i Policy Guidelines
‘Meeting the Grade’ states that the principal starting, finishing and stopping points should be accessible by public transport, and that full information on accessibility should be available. The SDCB’s ‘Management Strategy for the Sussex Downs AONB’ proposes action to encourage the use of public transport, and community-led transport initiatives. East Hampshire AONB Joint Advisory Committee recommends a variety of measures to improve public transport services and information.
ii Background
A number of initiatives have been established in the past to work with public transport providers to develop combined routes, and several Authorities operate an information system for bus routes. The South Downs Way is potentially well served by public transport, with major railway stations at either end, and crossed at intervals by arterial roads and railway lines, but information on these services needs to be more co-ordinated and distribution needs to be improved (see also section 8.3 on Provision of Information).
iii Objective
To work with service providers and other partners to develop high quality, accurate information on public transport, and to identify ways in which better use of public transport can be made.
iv Action Points
|
NO. |
ACTION |
YEAR(S) |
PARTNERS |
|
24 |
Produce a map showing the availability of buses and trains and information on the services, to be updated at least annually. |
2 — 5 |
Local Authorities, Transport Providers |
|
25 |
Work with service providers to develop reliable bicycle carrying facilities. |
3 — 5 |
Users Transport Providers |
|
26 |
Liaise with public transport providers to ensure that the use of public transport is maximized. |
3 — 5 |
CA, Users Transport Providers, Local Authorities |
|
27 |
Explore the opportunities for developing links with taxi operators. |
3 — 5 |
Service Providers, Users |
5.2 Car Parking Provision
i Policy Guidelines
‘Meeting the Grade’ advises that small, unobtrusive and informal car parks should be provided at strategic points not served by public transport, and the SDCB proposes a strategic approach to the provision of well-designed parking spaces. The impact on the environment should be minimised.
ii Background
A variety of car parks exist along the route, some owned by local authorities, and some by other bodies such as the National Trust. Most users of the Trail are short distance users, who travel by car. Although incentives to use public transport must be encouraged, consideration must be given to public safety, and to the safe parking of horse boxes where appropriate.
iii Objective
Small-scale car parking at strategic places along the route will be maintained or provided where it is necessary for the safety of users. Responsible use of car parking facilities will be encouraged to minimise any nuisance.
iv Action Points
|
NO. |
ACTION |
YEAR(S) |
PARTNERS |
|
28 |
Identify and record the details of all car-parking facilities within the corridor of the Trail. |
2-4 |
JAC/SDCB, HCC |
|
29 |
Continual monitoring of car parking will be undertaken to ensure responsible use is made of the facilities. |
ON-GOING |
HCC, SDCB, Users, Landowners |
|
30 |
Landscaping of car parks will be encouraged to minimise their impact without compromising crime prevention. |
ON-GOING |
SDCB, Local Authorities |
|
31 |
Further provision of car parking will only be considered where absolutely necessary, the promotion of public transport taking priority. |
ON-GOING |
NTO, SDCB Local Authorities |
5.3 Easy Access
i Policy Guidelines
‘Meeting the Grade’ states that full information on accessibility for less able people should be provided sufficient to allow people to assess their own capability to use particular sections of the Trail. The Countryside Agency has supported a project on the four South East National Trails called ‘Access For All’ with the objective of producing individual Action Plans for each Trail focusing on access for less able users. This has resulted in the production of a report called ‘Sense and Accessibility’ giving guidance on the management of access for less able users.
ii Background
The South Downs Way is ideally suited to the less able user as large stretches of it are reasonably level and on good tracks. Access is possible at a large number of points, giving the opportunity of a variety of routes of differing levels of difficulty and duration. The South Downs Way Action Plan will be produced during the summer of 2000.
iii Objective
To maximise the opportunity for easy access by identifying possible improvements and developing the potential of the Trail for a wide variety of users.
iv Action Points
|
NO. |
ACTION |
YEAR(S) |
PARTNERS |
|
32 |
Produce a South Downs Way Action Plan, following the guidance in ‘Sense and Accessibility’ |
1 - 2 |
NTO, CA, Users |
|
33 |
In accordance with the Action Plan, work with representative groups to identify the most suitable parts of the Trail (and linking routes where appropriate) for developing safe routes for easy access, and seek to implement. |
2 - 5 |
NTO Users, SDCB/Local Authorities |
|
34 |
Produce a leaflet(s) promoting safe routes for easy access, giving sufficient information on the Trail to permit individual choice to be made. |
2 - 5 |
NTO
|
5.4 Linking Routes
i Policy Guidelines
‘Meeting the Grade’ states that users should expect to find that linking footpaths or bridleways connect the Trail to services, and that signing should include details of what is available.
ii Background
Because of the location of the Trail on the ridge of the South Downs, often some distance from nearby villages, it is often necessary to leave the route to access services such as accommodation, shops and public houses. The SDCB have developed standard information signs for this purpose and this initiative needs to be extended. In addition, as the majority use of the Trail is short distance use, it is important to develop the linking paths to provide circular routes, helping to reduce the need for people to use their cars. It is important to give attention to linking routes that are available to equestrians and cyclists, and to take account of their requirements.
iii Objective
To improve the condition and signing of public rights of way linking to the South Downs Way to maximise the potential for the service providers in the nearby settlements, and to contribute to the sustainable use of the Trail.
iv Action Points
|
NO. |
ACTION |
YEAR(S) |
PARTNERS |
|
35 |
Identify the main linking paths from the South Downs Way with the potential to create circular routes, and improve and promote them as required. |
3 — 5 |
ALL |
|
36 |
Identify the services provided in the adjoining settlements, including public transport) and sign appropriately from the Trail, giving adequate details for users to make an informed choice. |
3 - 5 |
ALL |
6 TRAIL CORRIDOR
6.1 Landscape and Nature Conservation
i Policy Guidelines
The Countryside Agency policy on Management of National Trails states that the corridor of the National Trail will also be part of management strategies. As the South Downs Way passes through two AONBs, all the relevant local authority plans, AONB and other management plans contain policies to protect the area from inappropriate development, and to promote the conservation of nature and the landscape in general. The many areas which are close to, or co-incide with the Trail which are designated as being important sites for nature conservation purposes, also receive some protection under existing (and proposed) countryside legislation.
ii Background
The scenery through which the South Downs Way passes is one of the most important aspects of the National Trail for visitors, both long and short distance users, and it is also a very historic landscape. Interpretation plays and important part in helping to explain why the landscape and its heritage, both natural, and man-made, should be protected. Features that detract from the value of the landscape should be avoided and removed if possible.
iii Objective
To increase people’s awareness of the landscape, heritage and nature conservation value of the areas through which the South Downs Way passes, and to support the local authorities and others in their efforts to protect the corridor of the National Trail.
iv Action Points
|
NO. |
ACTION |
YEAR(S) |
PARTNERS |
|
37 |
Carry out a survey to identify and record features within the corridor that are of landscape, heritage and nature conservation value, or those which are detrimental. |
3 - 5 |
All |
|
38 |
Liaise with Local Authorities to ensure that inappropriate development, which could adversely affect the enjoyment of the Trail, is avoided. |
ON-GOING |
JAC/SDCB Local Authorities |
|
39 |
Work with local authorities and others to improve and protect the landscape, heritage and nature conservation value of the corridor. |
ON-GOING |
SDCB/Local Authorities, Landowners English Nature English Heritage |
|
40 |
Provide, and contribute towards, interpretive material to assist visitors understanding of the landscape, heritage and nature conservation value of the area. |
ON-GOING |
All |
6.2 Planning and Transport Policy
i Policy Guidance
The Countryside Agency recommend a partnership approach to the management of National Trails, and this is in line with Local Agenda 21 objectives. Liaison with local authorities and others throughout the production of management plans, structure plans and local plans should be encouraged, and the various plans should be compatible.
ii Background
Local Plans and Structure Plans vary in their content and in their reference to the South Downs Way, not only in terms of recreation value, but also tourism and economic development value, and transport issues. It is important to support those authorities which have identified issues relating to the South Downs Way to fulfil their plans, and also to encourage those authorities who perhaps have not recognised the potential impact on their policies of having a National Trail in or near their area. Even those authorities which do not host the route of the South Downs Way, are likely to have areas within the visual corridor, and probably also within the transport corridor. Short distance visitors will travel up to 30 miles for a day visit, and further for a short break, so there are also likely to be implications for tourism and economic development too.
iii Objective
To ensure that the full potential impact of the South Downs Way is realised in Local and Structure Plans affecting the corridor, and to liaise with local authorities in drawing up and executing relevant policies.
iv Action Points
|
NO. |
ACTION |
YEAR(S) |
PARTNERS |
|
41 |
To liaise with all local authorities, and to assist with the preparation, where required, of policies affecting or relating to the South Downs Way or the corridor. |
ON-GOING |
NTO SDCB/Local Authorities |
|
42 |
Respond to consultations on planning, development and transport issues which may impact on the South Downs Way or the enjoyment of users. |
ON-GOING |
NTO, SDCB/Local Authorities |
7 VISITOR MANAGEMENT
7.1 Conflicts of Interest
i Policy Guidelines
The Countryside Agency is committed to providing a range of sustainable recreation experiences, suitable for all interests and abilities. The SDCB recommends the use of zoning for certain activities and the adoption of codes of practice to help to avoid conflict.
ii Background
Although the route of the South Downs Way is a bridleway and can be followed on a bicycle and on horseback, the majority use is on foot. In addition, a significant length of the Trail follows tracks that are recorded on the Definitive Map as either Unclassified Roads, Byways Open to All Traffic (BOATs), or Roads Used as Public Paths (RUPPs) which have yet to be reclassified. Because of the accessibility of the route, there are also a considerable number of large, organised events that take place along part, or all, of the Trail. There is therefore considerable scope for conflict between users with different needs, and also between users and landowners and occupiers. All legitimate users have the right to be able to enjoy their use of the Trail, and land managers also deserve consideration. Some users, particularly those on foot, have expressed concern about what they perceive to be inconsiderate use by other users, and land managers have on occasion complained about users, usually in relation to a particular organised event.
iii Objective
To minimise the potential for conflict, perceived or otherwise, and promote good relations, between different user groups, and between users and land managers within the corridor of the South Downs Way.
iv Action Points
|
NO. |
ACTION |
YEAR(S) |
PARTNERS |
|
43 |
In conjunction with the Liaison Group, prepare and promote a Code of Respect for users of the South Downs Way and organisers of events, which acknowledges the needs of users and land managers. |
2 - 4 |
NTO Users, Landowners |
|
44 |
To set up and maintain, (on the web site if appropriate), a central register of organised and planned events, to co-ordinate activity and prevent conflict as far as possible. |
ON-GOING |
ALL |
7.2 Development of Circular Routes
i Policy Guidelines
‘Meeting the Grade states that amongst information that the user should expect are leaflets about circular walks and rides, and regional routes. This accords with the policy of managing the corridor of the National Trail in addition to the route itself
ii Background
There are certain sections of the South Downs Way which receive greater use than others due to their accessibility or, perhaps, because of their familiarity. There may be other areas of the Trail and the corridor in general which are worthy of being visited, but which receive less attention for a variety of reasons. At present, erosion is not as great a problem as is the case on some other National Trails, but it may become so in the future with higher profile of the area as a National Park. Encouraging users to visit other sections of the South Downs Way corridor could enhance the experience for them, in addition to benefiting service providers, and also reduce the possible impacts of greater usage. There is also a role for Guided Walks in encouraging the dispersal of pressure, in addition to their educational or marketing role. (See section 9)
iii Objective
To encourage wider use of the South Downs Way corridor by short distance users through the development and promotion of circular routes in order to disperse visitors and enhance the enjoyment of users.
iv Action Points
|
NO. |
ACTION |
YEAR(S) |
PARTNERS |
|
45 |
Identify areas of over-use and seek to develop routes in the vicinity of a similar nature that will provide alternative use and help to disperse visitor pressure. |
3 - 5 |
NTO JAC/SDCB, HCC |
8 SERVICES AND FACILITIES
8.1 Provision of water points/hitching posts and bicycle parking
i Policy Guidelines
‘Meeting the Grade’ states that drinking water for public consumption and for dogs and horses should be available at convenient locations along the Trail. Secure parking for horseboxes with hitching posts, preferably at farmsteads, should also be available.
ii Background
Water points have been provided at various locations along the length of the Trail in Sussex, but none currently exist in Hampshire. Those that do exist are not subject to regular checks or maintenance, although some receive more regular use than others. Because of the nature of the South Downs, there is little natural water available, and as the route is a bridleway, it is most important that additional facilities such as these are provided for the health and safety of users, including horses and dogs. Hitching posts and provision for securing bicycles will also be valuable to users at some locations.
iii Objective
To ensure that sufficient water points, hitching posts and bicycle parking facilities are provided at suitable regular intervals along the length of the Trail for the convenience and safety of users.
iv Action Points
|
NO. |
ACTION |
YEAR(S) |
PARTNERS |
|
46 |
Identify, in conjunction with partner organisations, suitable locations for additional water points, hitching posts and secure bicycle parking and implement. |
2 - 4 |
All |
|
47 |
Establish regular maintenance checks of facilities to ensure that they are kept in good order, and are not mis-used. |
ON-GOING |
NTO, HCC, SDCB |
|
48 |
Ensure that the locations of the facilities are well publicised in any literature for the Trail. |
1 - 5 |
NTO |
8.2 Provision of Accommodation
i Policy Guidelines
‘Meeting the Grade’ states that a variety of accommodation should be available, preferably within one mile, but not more than three miles from, the Trail, at principal stopping points. Many local authorities have policies that are favourable to unobtrusive appropriate holiday accommodation near to the South Downs Way or within the AONBs.
ii Background
Details of accommodation providers are contained in a guide, originally produced by the SDCB and updated at intervals. The current guide has been updated with an insert, and details are also available on the Web site. There are certain types of accommodation of which there is a shortfall, particularly the budget-type of hostels, bunk houses etc. The YHA are looking for sites to develop, and bed and breakfast providers frequently ask to be added to the list. It has not been felt necessary to grade the providers to date, although those that have received a listing from the Tourist Boards are indicated.
iii Objective
To provide the opportunity for a good range of accommodation to be available to users of the South Downs Way, and to work with partner organisations and individuals to achieve this.
iv Action Points
|
NO. |
ACTION |
YEAR(S) |
PARTNERS |
|
49 |
Carry out reviews of the current providers at appropriate intervals to update the information, and seek out or invite other providers to increase the range and number of facilities available. |
2 - 5 |
NTO, Service providers, Tourism Agencies |
|
50 |
Work with the YHA and others to identify sites for potential new hostels or bunkhouse barns. |
1 - 5 |
NTO, YHA, Service providers, Local Authorities |
|
51 |
Work with partner authorities to encourage applications for suitable holiday accommodation to be considered favourably. |
ON-GOING |
NTO, Local Authorities |
8.3 Provision of Information
i Policy Guidelines
‘Meeting the Grade’ sets out a wide variety of information which should be available on the National Trail, including leaflets on local history, archaeology, geology, wildlife and services available; interpretive boards and advisory signs, in addition to guide books and maps which should be regularly updated.
ii Background
There is an official guidebook for the South Downs Way, written by Paul Millmore and published by Aurum Press, which has currently received a minor revision and a small reprint run. A number of other guides exist, including one by the Society of Sussex Downsmen, but all written independently of the Trail management. Little or no information currently exists on services, except for the accommodation guide, and a leaflet on horse box parking facilities, both of which require revision. No co-ordinated information exists on the availability of public transport. The Ordnance Survey Explorer Map series is confusing because only two of the necessary six sheets mention the South Downs Way in the title, and it is expensive to have to buy so many maps. Even the 1:50,000 Landranger series requires four maps to cover the route. Harvey’s waterproof map is very popular, particularly with cyclists, but being a ‘strip’ map, has limitations for anyone wishing to interpret the surrounding landscape. It has recently been revised. The information board at the start of the route at Eastbourne is badly in need of revision and replacement, and the one at the Winchester end has disappeared.
The South Downs Way is a popular topic for projects, both for schoolchildren and for university students, and there is little statistical information available to assist them. The User Survey is in the process of being designed and printed, but there has been no dedicated condition survey carried out. The information on the condition in the Sussex section of the Trail is contained within their general rights of way survey data, and needs to be isolated. No details are currently available for Hampshire. This information is also vital for management and promotion purposes. (see action points 5 and 13)
iii Objective
To ensure that high quality and wide ranging information is available about the South Downs Way to enable users to gain the maximum enjoyment, so that educational needs are met, and to assist with the effective management and promotion of the Trail.
iv Action Points
|
NO. |
ACTION |
YEAR(S) |
PARTNERS |
|
52 |
Ensure that the Accommodation Guide is kept up to date and is easily available. |
ON-GOING |
NTO |
|
53 |
Liaise with Ordnance Survey to improve their information on the South Downs Way on the Landranger and the Explorer series. |
3 - 5 |
NTO, Ordnance Survey |
|
54 |
Liaise with other map and guide producers to ensure good quality information is made available for users. |
ON-GOING |
NTO, Other Publishers |
|
55 |
Prepare a number of leaflets giving information on various aspects of the Trail and its management, suitable for individual use, or to be combined into an educational pack. |
2 - 4 |
NTO |
9 MARKETING
9.1 Marketing Strategy
i Policy Guidelines
It is the policy of the Countryside Agency to promote National Trails as beacons for sustainable tourism, and for setting the standard for management of the rest of the public rights of way network. The Agency wishes to present a more co-ordinated and strategic approach to the marketing of National Trails and to raise their profile. They intend to appoint a consultant to prepare a national strategy, and to assist the National Trail Officers regionally.
ii Background
The English Tourism Council is currently promoting walking in England for holidays, and the South East Tourist Board has developed South East Walking Network as a means of encouraging people to consider walking for short or long breaks in the south east. Together with the appointment of a Marketing Officer for National Trails, there is now a need to focus on effective targeting of the potential market to help generate additional tourism-related business on and along the route of the South Downs Way. A marketing strategy needs to look at the potential for encouraging visitors to spend money in the area, helping to support the local economy, and also helping to fund the management of the Trail itself. The South Downs Way has the potential to attract a wider variety of visitors than some other routes, because of its status as a bridleway, which allows use by horse riders and cyclists, and also because of the relatively level nature of the path for considerable distances, allowing all abilities to use it. Guided walks, rides or other events are helpful to less confident users of the network, and can also be valuable as a means of managing usage. The main focus should be to broaden the appeal of the Trail, and to generate income rather than to increase visitor numbers significantly.
iii Objective
To promote the South Downs Way to as broad a sector of the market as possible, to enhance the financial benefit for the local community and the Trail itself, whilst seeking to preserve the character of the route and thus its attraction.
iv Action Points
|
NO. |
ACTION |
YEAR(S) |
PARTNERS |
|
56 |
To update and develop the Web site, using the accessibility of the medium to reach a wide audience. |
1 - 5 |
NTO, CA |
|
57 |
To seek opportunities to obtain publicity for the Trail in the media, and to use the media to promote the attractions of the South Downs Way in a sustainable manner. |
1 - 5 |
NTO, CA |
|
58 |
To continue to monitor the possibility of setting up a Visitor Payback scheme to raise awareness of the need for sustainable approaches to tourism. |
2 - 5 |
NTO, CA, JAC/SDCB, HCC |
|
59 |
To liaise with local businesses to ensure that there is a co-ordinated approach to marketing the Trail and that the potential is realised, without detriment to the character of the corridor. |
3 - 5 |
NTO, Service Providers |
|
60 |
To support the organisation of events which help to promote responsible use of the Trail, and also to encourage participation in activities that seek to protect the character of the route. |
ON-GOING |
NTO, JAC/SDCB, HCC |
|
61 |
To work towards the development of a Marketing Strategy, in conjunction with the Marketing Officer for National Trails, and partner organisations, bodies or individuals. |
3 - 5 |
NTO, CA ALL |
